Maurice Cerasi, Emiliano Bugatti, and d’Agostiono Sabrina
The Istanbul Divanyolu: A Case Study in Ottoman Urbanity and Architecture
Würzburg:
Ergon Verlag,
2003.
154 pp.; 8 color ills.; 89 b/w ills.
Paper
$62.50
(3899133706)
critical reviews of books, exhibitions, and projects in all areas and periods of art history and visual studies
published by the College Art Association
published by the College Art Association
Login
Not a CAA member?
Read about the benefits.
Read about the benefits.
Reviews by Category
Go to collegeart.org
- African Art (sub-Saharan)
- Architectural History/Historic Preservation
- Art of the Middle East/North Africa
- Art of the United States
- Artists' Books and Books for Artists
- Arts Administration and Museum Studies
- Ceramics/Metals/Fiber Arts/Glass
- Chinese Art
- Contemporary Art
- Critical Theory/Gender Studies/Visual Studies
- Decorative Arts/Textiles/Design History
- Digital Media/Animation
- Drawings/Prints/Photography/Works on Paper
- Early Christian/Byzantine Art
- Early Medieval/Romanesque/Gothic Art
- Egyptian/Ancient Near Eastern Art
- Eighteenth-Century Art
- Film/Video
- Graphic/Industrial/ Object Design
- Greek/Roman Art
- Japanese/Korean Art
- Latin American/Caribbean Art
- Native American
- Nineteenth-Century Art
- Oceanic/Australian Art
- Outsider/Folk Art
- Performance Studies
- Pre-Columbian Art
- Prehistoric Art
- Renaissance/Baroque Art
- Sculpture/Installation/Environmental Art
- South/Southeast Asian Art
- Twentieth-Century Art
- World Art
About caa.reviews
- caa.reviews Open Content
- Advertise
- Mission Statement
- Editorial Board and Field Editors
- Past Editors
- Terms of Use
- Publishers
- Submission Guidelines for Reviewers
- Republication Guidelines
- Citation Guidelines
- Letters to the Editor
- Dissertation Submission Guidelines
Go to collegeart.org
September 11, 2006
Sign In or become a member to see the full review
The “Divanyolu” in Maurice Cerasi’s title refers to the main thoroughfare of Ottoman Istanbul. Cerasi uses the Divanyolu to provide a novel lens on the city. According to the author, the Divanyolu escaped the attention it deserves in existing literature because it was not perfectly axial or unitary as a throughway. It was not built for the display of monumentality or as a hub of commerce. Yet, it was central to urban culture because of...