Login
Not a CAA member?
Read about the benefits.
February 12, 2008
Peter Allison, ed. David Adjaye: Making Public Buildings—Specificity, Customization, Imbrication Exh. cat. London and New York: Thames & Hudson, 2006. 224 pp.; 300 color ills.; 283 b/w ills. Cloth $50.00 (9780500342244)

Exhibition schedule: Whitechapel Gallery, London, January 24–March 26, 2006; Netherlands Architecture Institute, Maastricht, September 2, 2006–April 21, 2007; Studio Museum in Harlem, New York, July 18–October 28, 2007; Savannah College of Art and Design, Savannah, January 11–February 18, 2007; Museum of Contemporary Art, Denver, Denver, March 11–May 25, 2008

 
CrossRef DOI: 10.3202/caa.reviews.2008.13

Large
David Adjaye: Making Public Buildings. Exhibition view. Studio Museum in Harlem, New York. Photo: Adam Reich.

Sign In or become a member to see the full review

A certain swath of the collective museum-going, architecture-loving audience must be endlessly fascinated by the success of David Adjaye. Just forty-one years old, his rise to the top echelon of his profession has happened quickly, and has just as suddenly put his name into the minds of a larger group interested in celebrity homes, industrial design, and the perversely compelling cult of genius prodigies. That Adjaye is arguably the most prominent contemporary (if not twentieth-century) architect of African descent might also be deserving of some scrutiny, and yet Adjaye takes pains to suppress that aspect of his work, perhaps as a preventative or preemptive measure taken against those who might judge his accomplishments through the lens of affirmative action. Adjaye’s prestige is honestly earned and all his own, and clearly comes as a result of being one of the more thoughtful, articulate, and open-minded architects working before the public today. The projects themselves, on an extended exhibition journey that began at London’s Whitechapel Gallery at the beginning of 2006, are quite subtle and restrained. They generally lack the bombast of Eisenman, Gehry, Koolhaas—architects consumed, respectively, with fashionable theories of Deleuzian folds, Baroque effluvium, or satirical rebuffs to critiques of globalization....